October 19, 2026
The Question Parents Should Be Asking About Arts Training
By Ralph S. Opacic, Ed.D.
The Question I Hear Instead
Almost every parent who walks into an arts program asks the same question, in some form: "Will my child make it?" Will they get into a good conservatory? Will they land the lead? Will this turn into a career?
It is a fair question. But it is not the one that matters most, and I think most parents are asking it too early and too narrowly.
The Better Question
Here is the question I wish more families asked instead: what is this training actually building in my child, whether or not they ever perform professionally?
That question gets skipped because it is less exciting. It does not have a scoreboard. You cannot put "resilience" on a college application the way you can put a callback or a role. So parents default to outcome questions, and those questions push everyone, kids included, to treat training as a bet on a career rather than an investment in a set of habits.
What Training Actually Builds
Years of watching young performers work through material have shown me the same pattern over and over. A student spends months on a piece. It falls apart in rehearsal. They fix it; it falls apart differently. Eventually it holds together, and they walk onstage and do it in front of people who will notice if it goes wrong.
That process teaches things that have nothing to do with whether the student ends up on a stage at thirty. It teaches how to take direction without taking it personally. It teaches how to keep working on something after the excitement of starting it has worn off. It teaches how to perform under real pressure, not the manufactured kind schools sometimes use for practice, but pressure with an actual audience and a real chance of failing in front of them.
Ask a working artist which of these mattered more to their adult life: the technique or the discipline that got them through the boring middle part of learning it. Most will say the discipline.
Why This Matters More Now
I think this question matters more today than it did a decade ago, because so many young people now grow up interacting with feedback that is instant and low stakes: a like, a view count, a score that resets the next day. Arts training is one of the few places left where a kid has to sit with something difficult for months, with no shortcut, and come out the other side having actually changed.
That is not a knock on anything else in a young person's life. It is just a fact about how rare that kind of sustained effort has become, and why I think it is worth protecting on purpose rather than assuming it happens by accident.
What I Tell Parents Now
When a parent asks me whether their child has what it takes to make the arts a career, I try to redirect the conversation. I ask what they have noticed about how their child handles setbacks. I ask whether their child has ever finished something hard purely because they said they would, not because someone was checking on them.
Those answers tell you more about whether arts training is worth pursuing than any audition result does. A student who handles a rough rehearsal by getting quieter and more focused is building something durable. A student who only shows up when it is fun is not yet, and that is fine. It just means the training has more to do before the payoff shows up.
The Long View
None of this means outcomes do not matter. Plenty of young artists I have watched train do go on to real careers, and that is worth celebrating when it happens. But if the only measure of success is a career in the arts, most families will walk away disappointed, because most students, like most people in any field, will not end up working exactly where they trained.
The families who get the most out of arts education are the ones who ask the second question alongside the first. They still want to know if their child has real talent. But they also want to know what the training is doing to their child's character, because that is the part that stays with them no matter what they do for a living.
That is the question worth asking before the first one. It is just harder to answer, which is probably why it gets skipped.